Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 05:53
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Pregnant women warned against using weight-loss jabs - BBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Wine-Based Hangover Project Drops QEMU In Favor Of FEX & Box64 For Emulation - Phoronix
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
A year later, Trump continues to appeal his historic criminal case. Here's what we know - NPR
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What does it mean when someone is pretending to be me?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
All of the new features coming to Apple’s iOS apps - TechCrunch
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.